First off, let me say that I’m from Arkansas. And just like Mississippians make the joke, “Thank goodness for Louisiana!,” Arkansans make the joke, “Thank goodness for Mississippi!”
That said, I’m wondering if maybe Mississippi is ahead of the game this time.
Mississippi’s teen birth rate, although declining, is still 60% higher than that of the rest of the nation. And approximately 111 of the 6,100 births to teenagers in Mississippi were to mothers under the age of 16.
Effective July 1, doctors and midwives in Mississippi will be required to take umbilical cord blood samples from babies born to some women under the age of 16. The new law is intended to discourage older men from having sex with teenagers and to track down statutory rapists.
Lawmakers responsible for drafting the bi-partisan legislation believe it will deter older men from having sex with younger women:
“It is our hope that we can deter men over the age of 21 from having sex … with girls 16 years and younger, particularly if they know we are going to pursue them,” Jim Hood, the state’s Democratic attorney general, said.
If a girl is impregnated by a male more than three years older than her, the state will prosecute the baby’s father. This law applies to girls under the age of 16, which is the age of consent in Mississippi. Although the legislation has no opposition, it is poorly crafted in that it is unclear who would prosecute the men if they are located, or how lawmakers would determine where the baby was conceived in order to file charges. It also does not state who will pay for the DNA testing.
The bill is getting some push back from the state medical association, which has asked lawmakers to remove a provision that includes penalties for doctors who might not abide by the law. It is also getting push back from advocates for women.
Jamie Holcomb-Bardwell, director of programs for the Women’s Fund of Mississippi, believes the legislation’s focus is misdirected, saying that few teen pregnancies involve very young girls and much older men.
“It is a lot easier for politicians to talk about protecting young women than it is for them to talk about adequate sex education, access to contraception, looking at multi-generational poverty, [and] making sure we have an adequately funded education system,” she said. “All of these things have been shown to decrease the teen pregnancy rate.”
What Holcomb-Bardwell’s statement does not address, however, is sex trafficking. Sex trafficking is on the rise in Mississippi. Girls are forced into sex trafficking in a variety of ways, and their pimps are the ones who gain monetarily. Despite the fact that these girls are victims, they can be and are criminally punished for their “participation” in prostitution. The absurdity of this, of course, is that these young girls cannot “consent” to participating in prostitution. Even if they say “yes,” when a 12-year-old has sex with a 30-year-old, that 12-year-old is not yet developed enough to give true consent. This is certainly true when that “yes” is born of fear, early grooming, or a desperate need for “love” otherwise not available.
Nonetheless, in cases of child prostitution, police often target the girls instead of the pimps, because the girls are easier to catch. That makes a certain sort of sense, assuming the girls divulge the name of their pimp and/or stay off the streets, but unfortunately it doesn’t tend to happen that way. And as one of the top anti-sex-trafficking advocates in the nation states,
“Every act of what’s called … ‘prostitution’ with these children is actually a form of child sexual abuse — and to take it further, child rape,” she says. “So I don’t think children who are raped should be criminalized, no I don’t.” (Nole Brantley)
So if the children shouldn’t be criminalized, and the pimps are too hard to catch, what are the options for our police officers and prosecutors? Local, state, and federal governments need to start thinking creatively on this. Is Mississippi’s law the way to go? Well, maybe. If even one child under 16 becomes pregnant and the umbilical cord DNA leads to someone involved in a child- sex ring, the results could be amazing and far-reaching.
But, let’s go back to Holcomb-Bardwell, especially her point regarding multi-generational poverty. According to Brantley, it is often children from impoverished families who end up involved in sex trafficking. The reasons for this are many, and Holcomb-Bardwell is right that legislative efforts must begin there. Assuming that Mississippi’s new law takes up much-needed funds that could otherwise be spent on poverty eradication and the other areas mentioned by Holcomb-Bardwell, I have to say I agree with her. In a perfect world where funding is unlimited; however, I say “why not?” Every little bit helps, and this law may be a creative way to address sex trafficking.
I’d love to hear your thoughts. Do you think Mississippi has it right? Or is the law a dead end? What are some creative options for our law enforcement and our legislators?
5 thoughts on “Mississippi Teen Pregnancy Laws and Sex Trafficking – Has Mississippi Gotten it Right?”
I like the idea. I think it’s creative and may provide another angle for shutting down child sex trafficking operations, as you’ve said. I agree that addressing entrenched poverty is necessary, but in a red state, there’s bound to be opposition to that…a law that can be touted as “tough on crime” might meet less opposition from conservatives. It will be important to think it through and enact a law that can actually be carried out in a meaningful way…I’m the last person to be squeamish about the rights of rapists, but there may be civil liberties issues here. (Shout out to you from a silent fan…I’m a mom and a professional and I like what you say and how you write. Thanks for this piece.)
Beth, thanks so much for the thoughtful comment! I agree with all of your points. And thanks, too, for the kind words. They are very appreciated! 🙂
I doubt it. Prevention is always the key… but ignorance is a wrong key in the wrong padlock. That’s what politicians are doing to control women’s rights. If they want to have sex, let them have it, but with conditions! Don’t know if there’s any Planned Parenthood or any other public funded facilities or programs that helps women avoid unwanted pregnancies in Mississippi. But educating about the consequences of having sex doesn’t hurt much. Child Trafficking, that’s another issue and a very complicating one. Difficult to treat and impossible to eradicate, unless the government intervene in a solid solution to work both ways. In the meantime, they’re just putting band aids on everything that’s wrong, badly.
Thanks for taking the time to comment! I agree that we are, generally, putting band-aids on things. A band-aid is better than nothing, but my hope and prayer is that we could get to the real root of these problems and chop them down.
It’s a very interesting subject.